Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Twan Van Zijl vs Mika Lipp Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Zijl vs Lipp analysis and find out who is favored!
Want To Bet On The P1 vs P2 Match?
After checking out our Predictions and stats analysis, we recommend opening accounts at several Sportsbooks so you can get the best possible odds for the outcome. We recommend:
BetOnline
Our favorite for great odds and reliable service with a 50% Welcome Bonus (up to $1000) + 3 months FREE Matchstat*Bwin
Best for European users. Regional Welcome BonusesBetMGM
First bet offer, Get up to $1500 in bonuses if you don’t winSportsBetting
Competitive odds. First Deposit Doubled (up to $500) + 3 months FREE Matchstat*Cashwin
:Variety of betting options and 100% Welcome Bonus + 3 Months FREE Matchstat*- Bet365:
With competitive odds and live betting. Regional signup bonuses!
* To claim FREE Matchstat for 3 months – Click Here
If you’re not ready for real bets and want to practice, sign up for FREE at www.meerkatbet.com Enjoy simulated betting with our virtual currency, learn about value bets, and compete for monthly prizes in a risk-free environment.
Twan Van Zijl vs Mika Lipp Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Zijl 0 - 0 Lipp
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Zijl has won 50% of points on their second serve, while Lipp has won 52.24%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Zijl, in recent form, has won 51.19% of their opponent's second serve points, while Lipp has won 56.43%. The same stats for first serve returns are 30.23% and 36.88% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Zijl has saved 56.1% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Lipp has saved 46.67% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Zijl has won 52.5% of matches played (W/L 21/ 19), with Lipp winning 62.5% (W/L 30/ 18) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Zijl has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 63% (W/L 26/ 15), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 42% (W/L 11/ 15). Lipp has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 55% (W/L 28/ 23), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Player level: In the last year, Zijl has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 52.5% of matches (W/L 21/ 19), where as Lipp has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 63.83% of matches (W/L 30/ 17). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Zijl has played against opponents with an average rank of 45.58 while Lipp has played against players with an average rank of 68.81.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Zijl has won 70% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Lipp has won 67% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Zijl has converted 52.94% of breakpoint opportunities, and Lipp has converted 48.6% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
N/A
Rank
High
21
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
20
Age
Plays
Form
55% (37-30)
Career Total W/L
54% (36-31)
53% (9-8)
YTD W/L
64% (16-9)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Twan Van Zijl vs Mika Lipp For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Zijl VS Lipp
Get up to $1500 in bonuses if you don’t win!
Welcome bonuses
First Deposit Doubled
(Up to $500 is doubled on initial deposit)
+
Regional Signup Bonuses
With competitive adds and live betting
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Twan Van Zijl | Mika Lipp |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 53% (9/8) | 64% (16/9) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 48% (19/21) | 61% (33/21) |
| Games Win/Loss | 51% (204/199) | 56% (282/225) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 64% (7/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 33% (2/4) | 67% (16/8) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.01 | 0.04 |
| Aces Total | 1 | 9 |
| DFs per game | 0.02 | 0.08 |
| DFs Total | 4 | 20 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 78.4 |
| 1st Serve % | 80% (259/325) | 70% (624/892) |
| 1st Serve W% | 54% (139/259) | 62% (387/624) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 50% (33/66) | 52% (140/268) |
| BPs Won% Total | 53% (9/17) | 49% (52/107) |
| Return Pts W% | 37% (95/256) | 44% (401/906) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Futures W/L | 53% (9/8) | 67% (16/8) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 53% (9/17) | 64% (16/25) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 20% (1/5) | 0% (0/2) |
| Deciding Set W% | 83% (5/6) | 75% (3/4) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (6/6) | 100% (14/14) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (6/0) | 0% (14/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 27% (11/3) | 18% (11/2) |
Twan Van Zijl Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats 
Michiel De Krom
Player
Twan Van Zijl
79%
(
33 of
42)
1st Serve %
83%
(
43 of
52)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
0
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
23 of
43)
78%
(
7 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
10 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
25 of
52)
57
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Twan Van Zijl
Player
Brian Bozemoj
77%
(
100 of
130)
1st Serve %
56%
(
57 of
101)
0
Aces
11
3
Double Faults
9
62%
(
62 of
100)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
42 of
57)
43%
(
13 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
19 of
44)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
42%
(
55 of
130)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
40 of
101)
115
Total Points Won
116
|
4-6 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | |||
| Q2 |
Stats
Maxim Zhukov
Player
Twan Van Zijl
66%
(
42 of
64)
1st Serve %
78%
(
61 of
78)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
1
60%
(
25 of
42)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
27 of
61)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
10 of
17)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
44%
(
28 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
41 of
78)
77
Total Points Won
65
|
6-3 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-4 7-6(2) | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-1 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 7-5 7-6(7) | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-3 4-6 10-6 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-0 6-1 | H2H | |||
view more
Mika Lipp Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF | 6-4 4-6 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Mika Lipp
Player
Niels Visker
59%
(
47 of
79)
1st Serve %
50%
(
29 of
58)
0
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
0
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
20 of
29)
66%
(
21 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
32%
(
25 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
21 of
58)
75
Total Points Won
62
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mika Lipp
Player
Milan Markovits
71%
(
36 of
51)
1st Serve %
66%
(
33 of
50)
0
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
1
78%
(
28 of
36)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
40%
(
6 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
17 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
60
Total Points Won
41
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Lucas Gerch
Player
Mika Lipp
64%
(
55 of
86)
1st Serve %
65%
(
49 of
75)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
69%
(
38 of
55)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
29 of
49)
42%
(
13 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
41%
(
35 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
33 of
75)
84
Total Points Won
77
|
7-6(6) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mika Lipp
Player
Sergey Fomin
81%
(
43 of
53)
1st Serve %
69%
(
45 of
65)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
74%
(
32 of
43)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
50%
(
5 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
30%
(
16 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
27 of
65)
64
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mika Lipp
Player
Milan Welte
69%
(
43 of
62)
1st Serve %
68%
(
42 of
62)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
39%
(
24 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
29 of
62)
67
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mika Lipp
Player
Miguel Tobon
77%
(
40 of
52)
1st Serve %
66%
(
41 of
62)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
5
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
22 of
41)
75%
(
9 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
16 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
34 of
62)
70
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF | 7-5 4-0 ret. | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-0 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
view more
Zijl Vs Lipp Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Zijl are available here and Lipp photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
